Project Failure Files: The Pitfalls of Over-Regulation

In Episode 15 of the Project Failure Files weekly webcast, our focus was “The Pitfalls of Over-Regulation When Using Governance as a Hammer,” discussing the delicate balance between project governance and operational freedom, focusing on the pitfalls of excessive oversight. We discussed how over-regulation can stifle creativity, slow decision-making, and inflate project costs, while too little governance can lead to scope creep and disorganization. Drawing from real-world examples, we emphasized the need for governance frameworks that provide structure without inhibiting flexibility, ensuring that teams have the freedom to innovate while still maintaining accountability.

We also explored the cultural impacts of governance, highlighting how overly strict governance can lead to disengagement and frustration, while insufficient governance creates chaos and a lack of direction. This episode stresses the importance of a balanced approach that encourages collaboration and innovation without sacrificing the control needed to keep projects aligned with business objectives. We provided practical strategies for developing governance frameworks tailored to project size and complexity, integrating agile methodologies to maintain flexibility and responsiveness.

To wrap up, we offered actionable steps for ensuring that governance frameworks remain effective throughout the project lifecycle. By periodically reviewing governance policies, clearly communicating their purpose, and involving key stakeholders in governance decisions, teams can avoid the pitfalls of both over-regulation and under-regulation. The goal is to find that sweet spot where governance supports, rather than hinders, project success.

Enjoy the episode!

Be sure to tune in next Monday, September 30th at 9am Pacific for Episode 16 of this weekly series as Sharon and I discuss “Fighting the Good Fight: Mitigating Scope Creep.“ Join us on LinkedIn or YouTube.